Computing in school — comparison with water.

I teach computer science, not computer products. We need to stop pushing products.

Schools should be teaching computer science and IT, not products. At this time computers are set up as office tools, and many IT-support departments work in opposition to teaching computer science and IT. We look to the companies that sell software to teach us about software.

This is like asking Evian to help with pupils swimming classes, just because they make a lot of money selling water. Yes we can ask them to provide money, but often they, instead, send a crate of bottled water, and we get the pupils to try to swim in it.

There is nothing wrong with a bottled water company sponsoring a school. However we should not be using their water. It has been shown that bottled water costs about 1000 times more than tap water, in most places in the world the tap water is better than more than half of the bottled water, and in blind taste tests people can not tell the difference. The argument that it is provided for free to schools is irrelevant, this is a marketing ploy to create dependence (“first one’s free”). It is not about price, it is about education. Another thing these companies do is to move in to a region, and start pumping out water, so that there is none remaining for the local population. They then step in with a solution “buy our bottled water”. In parts of the world with a strong legal system there have been court cases (e.g. in the USA), but the companies have argued that it is not there fault “it was a bad year, it did not rain”. The fact that this was not devastating in the past, because there was not a big company extracting to much water, seems to be irrelevant. In other countries it does not even go to court.

This is exactly what is happening with computer software. We need to teach students to be responsibly empowered, to use computer in the way that will enhance there lives, and not be dependent on big corporations.

Therefore Microsoft, Apple, Oracle, Google, Facebook, … should have no place in the classroom. We should start this by not promoting them. We should then start removing them, so that pupils can learn, better, how computer work and how to use them.

Software, In the beginning.

This article only concerns the world of computers. If you never use a computer then this is of no use to you, stop reading now. But if you do then read on.

In the beginning [of the world of computers], there was Software, and the software had Freedom, and the Software was Free. The Software had freedom in the beginning. Through Free Software all computations were made; without Free Software no computations were made that have been made. In Free Software was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

“Free software” means software that respects users’ freedom and community. Roughly, the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. With these freedoms, the users (both individually and collectively) control the program and what it does for them.

When users don’t control the program, the program controls the users. The developer controls the program, and through it controls the users. This nonfree or “proprietary” program is therefore an instrument of unjust power.

Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free pizza”.
The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbour (freedom 2).
The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

Do we need Free Software — How can we bring about a socially just, environmentally sustainable, and spiritually fulfilling human presence in our computers?

https://ctrlaltdelor.wordpress.com/2013/01/10/free-software/ — part 0 Introduction

https://ctrlaltdelor.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/free-software-where-are-we-now/ — part 1 Where are we now?

https://ctrlaltdelor.wordpress.com/2013/03/10/free-software-how-did-we-get-here/ — part 2 How did we get here?

https://ctrlaltdelor.wordpress.com/2013/04/10/free-software-what-is-possible-now/ — part 3 What is possible now?

https://ctrlaltdelor.wordpress.com/2013/05/10/free-software-where-do-we-go-from-here/ — part 4 Where do we go from here?

Part 4 — Do we need Free Software? — Where do we go from here?

Try it

You can get many Free Software applications for Microsoft-Windows and Apple-Mac, but to really appreciate it you will need to run a Free operating system such as Gnu/Linux.

Debian Gun/Linux (and many others) will run directly from CD/DVD (live CD), so you don’t have to install it to try it.

Migration

“So how do I start using free software, I use xyz, I can’t change, I depend on abc.” Your current software provider does not care about your freedom. Sorry this is not fair, they do care, they care that you have none: They are actively trying to take away your freedom. This includes the freedom of choice, the freedom to change your mind, to use alternative software. They do this my making there software not interoperate, and by scaring you: telling you the other software is “incompatible”.

So you are locked in, how do you escape, don’t panic it is possible.

We will now look at migration roots. If you are new to computers you are lucky it is easy for you. However you will probably have the most fear, and need the most support. However if you are well entrenched you will need a migration strategy. You will need to start to move to a new way, but if you try it all at once you may fail. First I will show some things to consider, then show some ideas of what you can change.

Levels of freedom

  1. AwarenessThe most important step, if you miss this step you may be tempted by non-free software.
    It is important to value your freedom, to fight for it and to pay for it;
    Be prepared to pay more for Free Software than for non-free software.
    Remember Free Software is about freedom not price.
  2. Avoid lockin — use open standards (file formats / network protocols)It can be hard to change; We have been using software that uses proprietary formats, to lock us in, for years, so it may be difficult to change. Ironically it is easier for new users to adopt Free Software, but these are the least confident to do it on there own (so ask for help, or offer help depending on who you are). However it is still possible to change, and the sooner you do it the easier it is. An important step is to avoid lock-in by using open protocols/file formates.
  3. Use some Free SoftwareYou can run some Free Software on Microsoft Windows, Apple Mac and other proprietary systems.
  4. Install a Free operating system, such as Gnu/LinuxYou can install Gnu/Linux on most hardware including PC and Mac.
  5. Use 100% Free Software

Other factors

  • Free market vs closed market.
  • Free file formats / network protocols vs Locked-in.
  • Multiple supplier vs single supplier.

Migration Tools

  • Free Software is well established on servers, if you are running a business then migrate you servers to Free Software.
  • Stop generating files/documents in non open formats: Continue to use the old proprietary software only to read old files/documents, and configure the old tools to write open formats — Microsoft Office can now be configured to write Open Document Format.
  • Look at what Free Software applications are available for your current operating system.
  • Try out a Free operating system using a live CD/DVD.
  • Install a Free operating system, duel boot or in a virtual machine.
  • Then when you are doing most stuff with the Free system, put the old proprietary system in the virtual machine, with the Free system as the main system.

Above all find someone that can help you.

We have looked at reasons to use Free Software, but why write it?

  • Because it is the right thing to do.
  • Because I can be part of a community.
  • Because it gives be an opportunity to learn and extend my skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN7u1j44QTo&feature=colike
  • Because I want to give back, in gratitude for what I have received.
  • Because it well reduce my maintenance costs.
  • etc.

Be careful with language

Alternative names and confusing words

What about alternative names to avoid confusion of the word free, such as Open Source?
Some people use the term “Open Source”. Most software that is Open Source is Free Software. But the ideas are different.

In a mailing list post, MJ Ray FROM the Association For Free Software described some of the reasons why they strongly prefer the term “free software”:–

“Open Source” is an ambiguous phrase with definitions FROM OSI, !OeE, Becta, Microsoft(!) and many others. One of the original reason for the Open Source Initiative was to remove ambiguity by securing a trademark on the phrase (wishful thinking?) and to clarify things through marketing it. However, they didn’t get the trademark and their marketing effort is dwarfed by other people defining “open source” as other things. The Free Software Definition is simpler and the ideas have had 20 years or so to establish themselves.

Another reason for “Open Source” was to remove the connection with the ideas of sharing and being a good member of the community. From what I heard at the conference, those are still very popular ideas with people working in education. Some people class promotion of these ideas as political. I guess in that case, Chris could call AFFS a political group. Oh well. I’m not sure why it would be less popular with educators or why it should stop us promoting free software for the practical benefits too, though.

If you sympathize with the goal of providing effective promotion of our preferred software licensing, please use the older term “Free Software” and do the relatively simple explanation about “free as in freedom.” Ambiguity and division never help marketing.

note: Freedoms 1 and 3 require source code to be available because studying and modifying software without its source code is highly impractical.

The opposite of Free is proprietary, do not use the word commercial; Free Software can be exchanged for money, it can be commercial.

Do not use the word Intellectual Property. It lumps together many concepts, and allows the idea of theft to be applied. You can not steal in idea, as you can not take it off of somebody. They still have it, and you have it. You copied it, you grew it, there is now more of it than there was before.

Some people say “for free” this is not the same, you can sell Free Software.
Some people say “Freeware” or “Shareware” these are term that refereed to something else.
Some people say “free download” this is the same at “free of charge” is Free Software.
Some people say “Linux“ Linux is the most common kernel used in Gnu. If we refer to Gnu/Linux as just Linux, then what do we call Linux. Android phones contain Linux, but (usually) not Gnu. When you hear that Android contains Linux you may be fooled into thinking is like your desktop (Gnu/Linux).

What are we for, what are we against

We are not against anything, we are for freedom. We would like you to have freedom when you use your computer, but we are not saying you should use a computer.

We are not against the software companies, no, we believe that people should be free to sell software, including Free Software.

This is about your freedom, not about the suppliers. You have to demand Free Software (and be prepared to pay for it), or you won’t get it.

Summary

  • Free Software is about your Freedom, not about price.
  • We believe you will be free only when your device is free.
  • We believe that your device is your device.
  • We believe you should be able to decide what you want to do today.
  • We believe you should live in a world without walls, fences and gates :-)

What will you do next?

  • Try some Free Software today:
    • Download and use some Free Software for your current System.
    • Download a live Gnu/Linux System, and try it out.
    • Ask for help?
  • Tell other about Free Software.
    • Tell people what is happening and what exists.
    • Tell people about Freedom.
    • Use the words Free Software and explain what Free means (Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer”).
    • Share a link to this blog.
    • Take the material improve it and share it.

Other resources

Popular

https://www.openoffice.org/
https://www.mozilla.org/

Other Free Software for windows

http://opensourcewindows.org/
http://osswin.sourceforge.net/

Other Free Software for Mac

http://opensourcemac.org/

Free Software Operating Systems

http://www.debian.org/ — version 7 was released on 04 May 2013

About Free Software

http://www.fsf.org/


See a list of all my blog posts on Free Software at https://ctrlaltdelor.wordpress.com/tag/free-software/

Licenses: Creative Commons License
Free Software by Richard Delorenzi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Part 3 — Do we need Free Software? — What is possible now?

What is possible now

Free Software is growing fast. It is the fastest growing software sector, Microsoft’s have stated that it is there only real competitor.

Free Software is everywhere, you already use it:

  • A netcraft graph, showing what web-server software is used on the internet.Free Software web servers are running most of the Web. This graph shows that Apache (Free Software) is the most popular web server since 1995, before that NCSA (Free Software) was the most popular. nginx (Free Software) is growing in share, it may overtake Microsoft (proprietary) soon. In some of Netcraft’s graphs it already has.
  • Most of the infrastructure on the internet is running Gnu/Linux or BSD, both Free Software operating systems.
  • Most of the e-mail transport and Domain Name look-up is done on Free Software.
  • Google, WordPress, Wikipedia and others run on Linux and other Free Software. Even Hotmail (a Microsoft web mail server) runs partly on Linux.

Most of the top 500 super computers use free softwareScientists use Linux: Of the 500 fastest computers in the world 457 run Linux (Free Software), 1 BSD (Free Software), 1 Open Solaris (Free Software), 11 mixed Linux (Free Software) plus other, 28 run AIX Unix, 1 runs CellOS Unix and 1 runs Microsoft-Windows. That is 459 Free Software, 11 mixed, 30 Proprietary.

It is not just for geeks; The geeks saw the need first, but then others started joining in.

Chances are your web browser is Free Software
Chances are you are already using Free Software. Firefox and Crome account for about 50% and rising of browser use. They are Free Software. IE the default of Microsoft windows has under 50% and falling. OpenOffice.org, VLC, Audacity, Gimp, Inkscape, Filezilla, X-chat, PeaZip, Juice, Mplayer, Thunderbird, Miro, Pidgin, Transmission, zenmap, wireshark, Kdiff, mono, python, sub-version, VirtualBox(gpl version) to name a few, are all Free Software.

Screen-shot of KDE a windowing system used on Gnu/Linux
Free Software on the desktop. The Free Software desktop is as easy to use, or easier than Microsoft-Windows and Mac. It looks very similar, the change is like going from Windows XP to Windows 7, only better. Free Software had 3D desktop effects before Microsoft-Windows.

The Free Software that is produced not only is free, but is also low cost; You can usually download it for no charge, or get it for a few pounds (Free as in freedom, not as in free of charge). It also tends to be of higher quality than non-Free Software (as the motivation of the developers is to produce software not to make money, and because anyone can fix it).

Debian Gnu/Linux comes on 6 DVDs, though you only need one CD no get the core system. It includes pretty much all the software you will need. Equivalent to Microsoft Windows 7 Professional, plus Microsoft office, plus Microsoft Visual studio Professional, plus Microsoft Server, plus, plus, plus … . No Licenses to worry about. Just one single install for the base system, then just click to add applications.

List of organizations:

  • Free Software foundation
  • freedomdefined
  • Free art
  • Internet Engineering Task Force
  • Open Knowledge
  • Open Source
  • Free/Libre Knowledge

See a list of all my blog posts on Free Software

Part 2 — Do we need Free Software? — How did we get here?

magnifying-glass

How did we get here?

In the beginning all software was free. People wrote and shared software, they did not think about this freedom much if at all. At this time most organizations built there own hardware.

As computers got cheaper and more numerous companies started providing hardware, but people needed software and did not always want to or know how to write it. So the hardware manufacturers and other started producing software for them. To protect there time investment in producing this software they put copyrights on it and told people they must not run it without a license or copy, study, redistribute or improve the software. No one questioned this for a long time, as it all makes perfect sense.

This all continued, and one day a man said: This might make sense, but it is not good. Software should be free. We should be willing to pay for this freedom, so he started writing free replacement for all the software he used. He encouraged others to join him, slowly the snowball grew until we get to today.

unexamined assumptions

At least we have all this cool technology, we would not have it if it where not for the software companies.

Not true: I 1965 Gordon Moor noted that integrated circuits doubled in complexity, doubled in speed and half in cost every 18 months (for the first time ever the 2010 update predicts this to slow down in 2013 to every 3 years). So these improvements where in a sense inevitable, it just needed a industry to do it, but not the software “Industry”. It was the hardware industry that has provided all the advances.

The technology we use is the best that can be made.

Not true: In the late 1980s most computer systems where 32bit, multitasking, windowing systems, with long file names. In 1990 Microsoft does there first passable windowing system. In 1993 they finally produce a decent system with the help of Dave Cutler from Digital Equipment Corporation. It 1995, 1998 and 2000 they release a inferior systems (but they did look better, well as good as its competitors). Finally in 2001 we got the usable Windows XP.

Didn’t they give us the Internet

Not true: It started in 1950s and 1960s. The current protocols where standardised in 1982, the same year that Bill Gates said “What’s a network” to Acorn’s Herman Hauser, while trying to sell him MS-Dos; Herman had a better operating system and was not interested. In 1989, while working at CERN, Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web. The final restrictions on carrying commercial traffic on the internet ended on April 30, 1995 (CERN needed commercial inverters to upgrade it, so scientists could study huge data sets from there home country). And all internet protocols are Free.

Software is unimportant, we don’t need software

I can’t argue with that (and I am a software engineer), unless you are using it.

This Free Software thing sounds like a good idea. However if it is free no one will write it, and the quality will be poor

That is what they said about Wikipedia, but today it is huge and of better quality than proprietary encyclopaedias.
Wikipedia was inspired by Free Software; The Gnu project is at least 25 years old, it has been shown to be of better quality than proprietary Unix, and Unix to be of higher quality than MS-Windows. There is a lot of Free Software, Debian do a 6 DVD box set, of some of it.


See a list of all my blog posts on Free Software

Part 1 — Do we need Free Software? — Where are we now?

As was discussed in part 0, Free Software is about your freedom, not the price of the software.

Most of us use Propitiatory (non-free) Software, on our computers. This software sometimes has zero price, but always we have to do what we are told, and we do not know and can not know what is happening in our computer.

A sign saying to not entreIf a student asks “How does this work?”, then we have to say “I can not tell you, it is illegal to look.”

If you have some software, and I say “That is nice, can I have a copy?”, then you have to decide, whether to betray our friendship or to betray you agreement with the software vendor. Both are bad, what should you do?
a popup on a proprietary operating system, asking if user agrees

If you have multiple computers, and you install the same software in more than one computer then you are a criminal.

There may be back doors in the security, there is no way to know.

If you find a bug or wish to add a new feature (or ask a friend/company to), then you can not.

handcuffsWe are told that if you make copies, to help a friend, or to put on all your family’s computers. Then you are a criminal.

We are told that if you help others with fixes, then you are a bad person.

(These may not be a criminal offences, but we are told in marketing campaigns that they are).

There is a crises in education. Teachers try to teach children what they already know about computer. At graduation they only know how to use the products they are taught (or used at home); They are trained to be consumers of software. The software producers meanwhile can to hire school/university leavers to write new software at they are no longer of high enough quality; They have no experience, or knowledge of how the computer/software works.

Software producers may give away software to students. If a student is trained to use a product, then when they graduate, they or there company must pay. Students should be educated not trained.

Poorer people can not afford the software. Software provider keep the prices as high as possible. People in 3rd world countries have to pay more than is fair.

Defective by design

Proprietary software is often intentionally limited, depending on which version you have and how much you paid. Often you will see only the top of the range version in the advertisements.

Sometimes the amount of memory that is usable is limited, adding more will have no effect. Here is a comparison of some of the many MS-Windows versions, Gnu/Linux and my laptop. As you can see there is not much choice if I want to use all of my memory in 32-bit mode.

Operating system. Maximum Ram
32 bit 64 bit
Windows 7 Starter. 2 GB N/A
Windows 7 Home Basic. 4 GB 8 GB
Windows 7 Home Premium. 4 GB 16 GB
Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise, Ultimate. 4 GB 192 GB
Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation. N/A 8 GB
Windows Server 2008 Webserver. 4 GB 32 GB
Windows Server 2008 Enterprise. 64 GB 2048 GB
Gnu/Linux Desktop or Server. (Free Software) 64 GB 2048 GB
My cheep 2½ year old laptop. (Hardware) 8 GB 8 GB

To get more than about 3GB on any operating system, in 32 bit mode, you need to enable Physical Address Extensions (PAE). Both PAE and 64bit mode will break some drivers in MS-Windows. Because of freedoms 1 and 3, it was possible to fix all the device drivers in Gnu/Linux, so this is not a problem for this operating system.

The numbers for MS-Windows 7 is from Microsoft’s website. However I could not get more that about 3GB working on a work laptop with 4GB and windows Professional (even with PAE enabled). The same machine with Gnu/Linux used all 4GB. (This is not using the environment sparingly, the computer has 33⅓% more memory that is used.)

Microsoft also puts speed limitations, other resource limitations and also removes/disables features, in various version of there software. With Free Software if it has a feature then it has a feature.

This taken from pcworld advert for MS-Windows 7 Ultimate. I have highlighted some of the features you don’t get in lesser versions of MS-Windows 7. Note Gnu/Linux has all this except a gratis copy of XP, though you are free to run this non-free operating system in a virtual machine:

Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate offers all the exciting improvements of Home Premium and Professional, plus added security features and the ability to work in any of 35 languages. This release is designed for demanding users who want it all!

The Multilingual User Interface included with Windows 7 Ultimate lets you install multiple interface languages simultaneously – particularly useful for multi-user environments. Another impressive addition is BitLocker Drive Encryption, which offers full-disk encryption for entire volumes. In a change from previous versions of BitLocker, the Windows 7 version enables encryption of removable drives too.

Running Microsoft Windows XP applications remains crucial for business productivity and backward compatibility, so Windows 7 Ultimate includes a virtual machine package called Windows XP Mode. This ensures flawless running of XP programs on the latest hardware, while enabling you to benefit from the modern features of Windows 7.

Windows 7 Ultimate is the result of two years of customer research, so it includes many changes you requested. Everyday tasks are made simpler and quicker, requiring fewer clicks and less time. Notebook users in particular will appreciate the improved power-management features, reduced memory footprint, and faster sleep and resume. And everyone is sure to love the new entertainment options in Windows Media Center, the improved window management, and the sleek new user interface elements!

Whether you plan to build a new system or upgrade your existing PC, Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate will get the very best out of your hardware! Its modest system requirements make it suitable for installation on everything from ultra-portables to gaming systems, and this release includes both 32-bit and 64-bit versions for ultimate flexibility.

Monopoly

Through competition, un-fair trading and the nature of un-free software, most software companies have been acquired by the remaining few. This has lead to a monopoly situation.

the game of monopolyA monopoly is bad.

If the company that provides the software disappears (goes bankrupt) then we are in trouble. If they put up prices then we pay or weep. We weep over all the work we did that can no longer be accessed, without the proprietary software. Do not think that a big company like Microsoft can not go bankrupt. Look at the banks; look at the agony of the countries trying to support them from bankruptcy; look at the banks that are bankrupt.

We all know, but often ignore the teaching, “be good to your customers, and they will be good to you.” This is not true if you are a monopoly. If you are a monopoly you should produce bad quality products that fall apart, and rapidly release new and slightly better products that do not satisfy. You do not want to be a customer of a monopoly. A Duopoly, Triopoly or Quaiopory is little better.

We are now in a world where there is almost only one commercial provider of software. Most competitors have gone out of business, or where put out of business by Microsoft. Now the only noticeable providers of commercial operating systems for desktop computers is Microsoft and Apple. Microsoft talks of Apple as “the alternative”, to not only put Apple down, but to stop you thinking about the alternatives. But Microsoft have stated in an internal memo that their only real competitor is Free Software.

Vendor lock-in

an exit that is lockedPropitiatory software providers, often write there software not to use open standards, so that the files can only be read by there software. They try to make it impossible to switch to an alternative, but now your are to reliant on them.

Social Justice

Without the users of the computer free to decide how to use the computer, they are a slave to the software producer.

Without the users being free to study how it works they are unable to break free.

With out the freedom to improve, the users are trapped and manipulated to buy upgrades.

With out the freedom to pay a friend or stranger to fix or improve the software, we are not free.

Even if I am free, it is difficult to visit you when you are in prison. Therefore I must help you to be free.

an angry man jumping on his computer, and braking it.

Spiritual fulfilment

If we are continually frustrated with our computer, yet can see a solution that we can do nothing about, then we can not be spiritually fulfilled. At least while using the computer.

Environmental sustainability

When you can’t change it, you have to start again. This is a huge waste, of time and effort. This time could be spent writing new software.

With free software you don’t tend to get big boxes. One for operating system, one for office, one for virus scanner, one for … . Instead you have just one shiny disk, to share amongst all the computers in your community.

(For those of you that already use Free Software, and don’t know what a virus scanner is: A virus is a piece of malicious software that exploits known bugs and design defects in an operating system or its services. If you don’t fix the bugs and design defects, an alternate technique that has had some success it to try to detect every single virus that has and will be written. This has the advantage that you can charge extra for this partial fix to your shoddy workmanship. It is like putting your technical support or complaints phone line on a 09 number(50p a minuet or more). There worse you perform the more calls you get, and the more money you make.)

Gnu/Linux can run well on older hardware, sometimes better than MS-Windows on new faster hardware.

Gnu/Linux uses less hard-disk space.


See a list of all my blog posts on Free Software

Part 0 — Do we need Free Software? — Introduction

Introduction

How can we bring about a socially just, environmentally sustainable, and spiritually fulfilling human presence in our computers?

This article is inspired by the Be The Change Initiative from the Pachamama Alliance. But it is not endorsed by them. There mission is to bring about “A socially just, environmentally sustainable, and spiritually fulfilling human presence on this planet”. My goal here is smaller it is to explore one aspect of how we use our computer.

If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.

— George Bernard Shaw.

We believe that software should be free, to be software. A photo of the statue of liberty

  • 0. We believe you should have the freedom to run the program for any purpose.
  • 1. We believe you should have the freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish.
  • 2. We believe you should have the freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbour.
  • 3. We believe you should have the freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and modified versions in general) to the public, so that the whole community benefits.

What do we mean by Free Software? We are meaning freedom, not price. Though it is not about price, freedom 2 will lead to low prices, but this is by no means the main reason; If we value our freedom then we should be willing to pay more for it.

Outline of the articles

In the coming articles we will be looking at 4 question, one per article per month. Click the article below, but check the dates to see if published yet, if not you will have to wait.

  1. Where Are We? – an examination of the state of software, and how this affects environmental, social and personal well-being. (published 2013/02/10)
  2. How did We Get Here? – tracing the root causes that lead to our current situation. (published 2013/03/10)
  3. What’s Possible Now? – discovering new ways of seeing software and looking at the emerging Movement for change, and what has already been done. (published 2013/04/10)
  4. Where Do We Go from Here? – considering our stand and our personal and collective impact, and ask what can I do. (published 2013/05/10)

Watch a video by Stephen Fry, then read the next chapter, next month.
See a list of all my blog posts on Free Software

Changes

Change is not necessary,
but evolution is compulsory.

Change is painful,
you do not have to change.

To stay the same is easy,
To stay the same in a changing world is fatal.

Do you want to change?
No.

Do you have to change?
No.

Will you do it anyway?
Will you become more than you are?

Will you drop that, that does not work?
Will you grow that, that does work? Cleaning and nurturing it.

Will you survive?
Will You LIVE?

What is good food?

I was talking to someone the other day about healthy eating, what is healthy, what is not. Another friend joined the conversation, and said that people should just eat what ever they like. At first I was annoyed that they where trying to undermine the conversation. But then I released they where right.

Humans have evolved for millions of years ( or where created ), to like food that will be advantages (healthy) to them. However more recently food scientists and marketing people have created food that tastes, looks, smells, sounds, and feels good, even (especially) when it is not good for us.

Therefore:

Forget about nutrition, forget about whether the additive is safe, forget everything you have learned about healthy food.

  • Don’t get your food from a food manufacturer. Get it from a farmer or garden.
  • Don’t eat anything with added colour, flavor, vitamins, sweetener, etc. Food should have its own colour, flavor, vitamins.
  • Don’t eat anything that is over processed. Some foods need chopping and cooking but don’t over do it.
  • Don’t allow others to mess with it to make it taste good, just use good ingredients, cooked well.

All colour, flavor, sweetener etc are bad for you, they fool the brain into thinking the food is healthy, even if consciously you know it is not. (your conscious brain can not win a battle of wills against your unconscious brain.) Therefore all use of colour, flavor, sweetener etc is false advertising / a fraud.


This sums it up “eat food not too much mostly plants” — Michael Pollan

Be the change facilitator

I have just returned from Scotland, where I was on a course to become a be-the-change facilitator.

To bring forth an environmentally sustainable, spiritually fulfilling, and socially just human presence on the planet.

see: http://bethechange.org.uk/

http://www.joannamacy.net

Lookout for future posts in category be-the-change.